Skip to main content

RMO 2024: Discussing Solutions

Hello everyone! 

Congratulations to everyone who attempted the RMO 2024. As you might know, we had an amazing livesolve of the paper with Archit, Adhitya, Abel and Kanav which you can check out here. We also have question wise video solutions to all the problems, thanks to Nanda, Om and Shreya! 

We had a lot of people interested in solutions for the KV/JNV paper, which is what this blog post will be about. Without further ado, let's get started!

Problem 1: Find all positive integers $x,y$ such that $202x+4x^2=y^2$.

Solution: Notice that $y>2x$. Let $y=2x+k$ for some integer $k>0$. Thus, the given equation reduces to $$202x=4xk+k^2\implies x=\frac{k^2}{202-4k}\cdots (1)$$ This tells us that $202-4k|k^2,$ or that $101-2k|2k^2\implies 101-2k|101k$. However, since 101 is a prime, $\gcd(101-2k,\,101)=1\implies 101-2k|k$ or that $101-2k|2k\implies 101-2k|101\implies k=50$. Substituting in $(1)$, we get that $x$ must be $$\frac{50^2}{202-4(50)}=50\cdot 25=1250.$$ Thus, $$y=2x+50=2550.$$ We conclude that the only solution is $x=1250$ and $y=2550$, which is easy to verify.

Problem 2: Show that there do not exist non-zero real numbers $a,b,c$ such that the following statements hold simultaneously: 

  • the equation $ax^2+bx+c=0$ has two distinct roots $x_1,x_2$; 
  • the equation $bx^2+cx+a=0$ has two distinct roots $x_2,x_3$; 
  • the equation $cx^2+ax+b=0$ has two distinct roots $x_3,x_1$. 
(Note that $x_1,x_2,x_3$ may be real or complex numbers.)

Solution: This is going to be a bit computational. Here we go:
We know that $ax_1^2+bx_1+c=0$ and $cx_1^2+ax_1+b=0$. Eliminating the quadratic term, we see that $$\left(\frac{b}{a}-\frac{a}{c}\right)x_1=\frac{b}{c}-\frac{c}{a}\implies x_1=\frac{c^2-ab}{a^2-bc}.$$ Similarly, $$x_2=\frac{a^2-bc}{b^2-ca},\,x_3=\frac{b^2-ca}{c^2-ab}.$$ Further, since $x_1,$ $x_2$ are roots of $ax^2+bx+c$, their product is $c/a$. This tells us that $$\frac{c^2-ab}{b^2-ca}=\frac{c}{a}\implies c^2a-a^2b=b^2c-c^2a$$ $$\implies 2c^2a=a^2b+b^2c$$ Similarly, we must have $$2a^2b=b^2c+c^2a$$ Subtracting the two, we get $$c^2a=a^2b\implies c^2=ab.$$ By symmetry, we must also have $$a^2=bc,\,b^2=ca\implies abc=a^3=b^3=c^3.$$ $$a^3-b^3=0\implies (a-b)(a^2+ab+b^2)=0\implies (a-b)(a^2+c^2+b^2)=0$$ Since $a,b,c$ are given to be non zero reals, we must have $a-b=0\implies a=b$. Thus, it is easy to see that $a,b,c$ are all equal. However, this means that the three sets $\{x_1,x_2\},\{x_2,x_3\},$ and $\{x_3,x_1\}$ are the same. This happens if and only if $x_1=x_2=x_3$, but that cannot be possible since $ax^2+bx+c$ has two distinct roots when $a=b=c$. Phew. QED. 

Problem 3: Let $ABC$ be an equilateral triangle. Suppose $D$ is the point on $BC$ such that $BD:DC=1:3$. Let the perpendicular bisector of $AD$ intersect $AB,AC$ at $E,F$ respectively. Prove that $49\cdot[BDE]=25\cdot[CDF]$ where $[XYZ]$ denotes the area of triangle $XYZ.$

Solution: Let's bash this! We define a co-ordinate plane such that point $B=(-2,0)$, $C=(2,0)$ and $A=(0,2\sqrt{3})$. Notice that $D=(-1,0)$. We compute the equation of the perpendicular bisector of $AD$ to be $$y=\frac{-1}{2\sqrt{3}}x+\frac{11}{4\sqrt{3}}$$ Intersect this with the equations of $AB,AC:$ $$y=\sqrt{3}x+2\sqrt{3},\,y=-\sqrt{3}x+2\sqrt{3}$$ to get the $y$-coordinates of $E,F$ as $15\sqrt{3}/14$ and $7\sqrt{3}/10$ respectively. Thus, $$\frac{[BDE]}{[CDF]}=\frac{1\cdot15\sqrt{3}/14}{3\cdot 7\sqrt{3}/10}=\frac{25}{49}.$$

Problem 4: Let $n>1$ be a positive integer. Call a rearrangement $a_1,a_2,\cdots,a_n$ of $1,2,\cdots,n$ $nice$ if for every $k=2,3,\cdots n$ we have that $a_1^2+a_2^2+\cdots+a_k^2$ is not divisible by $k$. Determine which positive integers $n>1$ have a nice rearrangement. 

Solution: Observe that $1^2+2^2+\cdots+n^2=n(n+1)(2n+1)/6$ is divisible by $n$ if and only if $6$ and $n$ are co-prime. Thus, we claim that we can have nice rearrangements for all $n$ such that the gcd of $n$ and $6$ is greater than $1$. We start with $a_1=1,a_2=2$. We propose the following recursive construction: if $k$ and $k+1$ are both not co-prime to $6$, then we can append $k+1$ to the nice rearrangement of $k$. If $k+1$ is not co-prime but $k$ is, then append $(k+1), k$ to the nice rearrangement of $k-1$. (I've always wanted to say this) The details are left for the reader to figure out!

Problem 5: Let $ABC$ be a triangle with $\angle ABC = 20^\circ$ and $\angle ACB=40^\circ$. Let $D$ be a point on $BC$ such that $\angle BAD=\angle DAC$. Let the incircle of triangle $ABC$ touch $BC$ at $E$. Prove that $BD=2\cdot CE$.

Solution: If I absolutely had to pick a favorite problem from this paper, it would probably be this one. Let $AB,BC,CA$ have lengths $c,a,b$ respectively. We know that $CE=(a+b-c)/2$. By the angle bisector theorem, since $BD/DC=AB/AC=c/b$ and $BD+DC=a$, we compute $BD=ac/(b+c)$. Thus, we wish to show $$(a+b-c)(b+c)=ac\iff ab+b^2=c^2.$$ Let the angle bisector of $\angle C$ intersect $AB$ and $X$. Notice that $\Delta ACX\sim\Delta ABC\implies AX/AC=AC/AB.$ By the angle bisector theorem, $AX=\frac{cb}{a+b}$. Thus, $$\frac{cb}{a+b}=\frac{b^2}{c}\implies c^2=b(a+b)=b^2+ab.$$ QED.

Problem 6: Let $X$ be a set of $11$ integers. Prove that one can find a non empty subset $\{a_1,a_2,\cdots,a_k\}$ of $X$ such that $3$ divides $k$ and $9$ divides the sum $\sum_{i=1}^k4^ia_i$.

Solution: The key observation in this problem is that among any $5$ integers, there exist $3$ such that their sum is divisible by 3 (why?). Let $a_1, a_2, a_3$ be such numbers from $X.$ Notice that $s_1=4a_1+16a_2+64a_3\equiv a_1+a_2+a_3\equiv 0(\text{mod }3)$. If $9|s_1$, we are done. Thus, $s_1$ must be $3$ or $6$ modulo $9$. Further, from the remaining $8$, there is another set of $3$ numbers $a_4,a_5,a_6$ such that their sum, $s_2$ is divisible by $3$. Again, if it is divisible by $9$, we are done and so $s_2$ is either $3$ or $6$ modulo $9$. Notice that if $s_1+s_2\equiv0(\text{mod }9)$, we can consider $k=6$ and $a_1,a_2,a_3,a_4,a_5,a_6$ to find the desired set. It must mean that $s_1$ and $s_2$ are both $3$ or both $6$ modulo $9$. Now, notice that we have $5$ numbers remaining in $X$. Again, there exist three out of these, say $a_7, a_8, a_9$ such that their sum $s_3$ is $0$ mod $3$. We consider three cases:
Case I: $s_3\equiv0(\text{mod }9)$. Then we are done - consider $k=3$ and $a_7, a_8, a_9$. 
Case II: $s_3\equiv3(\text{mod }9)$. If $s_1$ and $s_2$ were both 3 modulo 9, we set $k=9$ and consider numbers $a_1$ through $a_9$, Otherwise, if $s_1$ and $s_2$ were both 6 modulo 9, we set $k=6$ and consider the numbers from $s_1$ and $s_3$. 
Case III: $s_3\equiv6(\text{mod }9)$. This case is very similar to that of Case II. Left as exercise. 

Hope this was helpful! 
Signing off,
Saee
xoxo

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

LMAO Revenge

Continuing the tradition of past years, our seniors at the Indian IMO camp(an unofficial one happened this year) once again conducted LMAO, essentially ELMO but Indian. Sadly, only those who were in the unofficial IMOTC conducted by Pranav, Atul, Sunaina, Gunjan and others could participate in that. We all were super excited for the problems but I ended up not really trying the problems because of school things and stuff yet I solved problem 1 or so did I think. Problem 1:  There is a   grid of real numbers. In a move, you can pick any real number  ,  and any row or column and replace every entry   in it with  .  Is it possible to reach any grid from any other by a finite sequence of such moves? It turned out that I fakesolved and oh my god I was so disgusted, no way this proof could be false and then when I was asked Atul, it turns out that even my answer was wrong and he didn't even read the proof, this made me even more angry and guess wha...

The importance of "intuition" in geometry

Hii everyone! Today I will be discussing a few geometry problems in which once you "guess" or "claim" the important things, then the problem can easily be finished using not-so-fancy techniques (e.g. angle chasing, power-of-point etc. Sometimes you would want to use inversion or projective geometry but once you have figured out that some particular synthetic property should hold, the finish shouldn't be that non trivial) This post stresses more about intuition rather than being rigorous. When I did these problems myself, I used freehand diagrams (not geogebra or ruler/compass) because I feel that gives a lot more freedom to you. By freedom, I mean, the power to guess. To elaborate on this - Suppose you drew a perfect  diagram on paper using ruler and compass, then you would be too rigid on what is true in the diagram which you drew. But sometimes that might just be a coincidence. e.g. Let's say a question says $D$ is a random point on segment $BC$, so maybe ...

Edge querying in graph theory

In this post, I will present three graph theory problems in increasing difficulty, each with a common theme that one would determine a property of an edge in a complete graph through repeated iterations, and seek to achieve a greater objective. ESPR Summer Program Application: Alice and Bob play the following game on a $K_n$ ($n\ge 3$): initially all edges are uncolored, and each turn, Alice chooses an uncolored edge then Bob chooses to color it red or blue. The game ends when any vertex is adjacent to $n-1$ red edges, or when every edge is colored; Bob wins if and only if both condition holds at that time. Devise a winning strategy for Bob. This is more of a warm-up to the post, since it has a different flavor from the other two problems, and isn't as demanding in terms of experience with combinatorics. However, do note that when this problem was first presented, applicants did not know the winner ahead of time; it would be difficult to believe that Bob can hold such a strong...